When it comes to vaccine mandates, employers have the law on their side

By: - August 9, 2021 5:55 am
A vial of covid vaccine

The state knows some booster shots are being included in the state’s vaccination rate but not how many. (Getty Images)

It’s a short conversation when workers call employment attorney Jon Meyer asking if their employer can require a COVID-19 vaccination and fire them if they refuse. With very few exceptions, the answer is yes – regardless of arguments that doing so is illegal until the vaccines get final approval from the Food and Drug Administration. 

“Whether the FDA approval is emergency or final is completely irrelevant,” said Meyer of Backus, Meyer, and Branch in Manchester. “The fact that you have a right not to take a vaccine would not be a reason why a private employer could not fire you.” 

More New Hampshire employers are considering mandating COVID-19 vaccines as immunizations lag and the Delta variant pushes COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths up. Dartmouth-Hitchcock announced this week it’s mandating vaccinations for its 13,000 employees by the end of September. The New Hampshire Hospital Association has asked all health care providers to do the same. Employment lawyer Jim Reidy of Sheehan Phinney, who works with employers, heard from four clients on Thursday alone asking about the legalities of mandates.

The restrictions on employers who want to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations are few. 

Most common are requirements that employers provide “reasonable” accommodations for certain medical conditions and “sincerely held” religious beliefs. For the latter, it isn’t enough to say your faith relies on the Holy Spirit for healing or cite a Bible passage suggesting the vaccine is poison, something employment lawyer Beth Deragon at Pastori Krans has seen. 

Reidy and Deragon said to qualify for a religious exemption, the person must belong to the congregation and cite an opposition that is part of the church’s doctrine. And those who ask for a religious accommodation must sign an affidavit that their claims are true.

There is one additional restriction in New Hampshire. A new state law prohibits state, county, or local governments from requiring employees to be vaccinated, except at the state hospital, county nursing homes, or other government-run medical facilities.

The state Department of Health and Human Services, which runs the state hospital and Glencliff Home for the Elderly, is not currently mandating vaccines for its health care workers. Asked if that would change, spokeswoman Laura Montenegro said in an email, “We are reviewing our current vaccination level at our facilities and that information will inform our decision making.”

Since COVID-19, there has been a third exemption requested. 

The “emergency use authorization” given to the Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson and Johnson vaccines requires recipients to be informed they have “a right to accept or refuse the vaccine.” Federal authorities have interpreted that to mean employees can refuse the vaccine, as in it won’t be forced upon them, but can still be fired if they refuse. 

The U.S. Justice Department issued an 18-page brief last month detailing the history of the emergency use authorization (it was first proposed by President George W. Bush) and analyzing Congress’s intent in passing it as part of a package called Project BioShield. The department concluded the “accept or refuse” language is a requirement to inform recipients of their rights, not a prohibition against firing them if they refuse and don’t qualify for an exemption.

The U.S. Justice Department brief cites a 2021 court decision in which a judge came to the same conclusion, ruling a vaccine mandate is not coercive because it provides employees who refuse a vaccine another option. “She will simply need to work somewhere else,” the judge wrote.

Reidy said judges who’ve presided over other vaccine mandate challenges have ruled similarly.

Like Reidy, Deragon has heard this objection raised.

“It seems to me that there is a group of people who say this emergency authorization means that you can’t mandate the vaccine,” Deragon said. “I don’t quite see that given federal guidance regarding vaccination.” Among that guidance is the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission affirmation  of the right to mandate a COVID-19 vaccine. 

Meyer put his legal analysis this way: “These are arguments that sound good on social media,” he said, but don’t have any legal merit. 

The lawyers said the challenge for employers is not issuing a mandate but enforcing it legally. 

“If employers say everyone must be vaccinated without providing those accommodations, that’s a big problem,” Deragon said. Meyer said employers with unionized employees may not be able to mandate a vaccination without making it part of contract negotiations. And Reidy said employers must treat all employees the same and not, for example, bend the rules for valuable employees who say they’ll stay if they can be excused from the vaccine mandate. 

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Annmarie Timmins
Annmarie Timmins

Senior reporter Annmarie Timmins is a New Hampshire native who covered state government, courts, and social justice issues for the Concord Monitor for 25 years. During her time with the Monitor, she won a Nieman Fellowship to study journalism and mental health courts at Harvard for a year. She has taught journalism at the University of New Hampshire and writing at the Nackey S. Loeb School of Communications.

MORE FROM AUTHOR